Re: [tor-talk] Sybil Attack

[lizards@xxxxxxxxxx]

It's a bit odd that any of them would have the BadExit flag since it's
pretty unlikely you could pull off a successful Sybil attack from so
tightly grouped hosts.
> I'm abit concerned about not having a consensus of the dirauth's
> knowing about the BadExit flag. Is this a problem? Only 4/9 know about
> that flag right now and 3/9 are missing signatures. Can someone
> explain this better? Thanks!
>
> https://consensus-health.torproject.org/
>
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Soul Plane <soulplane11@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Thomas White <thomaswhite@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> There has been some worry about a possible Sybil attack on the Tor
>>> network and a threat of deploying a 0 day once a Sybil has been
>>> confirmed. The concerned relays right now are using then nickname
>>> LizardNSA followed by random characters
>>>
>>
>> There is also FuslVZTOR followed by random characters, 246 right now all
>> from uk 212.38.181.x. I checked a couple the family info on a couple and
>> none is set. I don't know if that is normal or not I've never watched
>> the
>> relays.
>> --
>> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>


-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk