On 10 Dec (19:04:02), nusenu wrote: > take a look at the "e_prob" column: > > https://github.com/nusenu/tor-network-observations/blob/master/2015-12-10_relay-families.txt > > > How did he manage to get such a high consensus weight > (~10x ipredator's cw)? > > > > these four 0.2.7.5-dev relays were first seen on 2015-12-10 04:00:00 > are down since a few hours now > https://atlas.torproject.org/#search/contact:robgjansen Hi! This morning I noticed a huge spike in the estimated exit probability per continent graph and network capacity graph: http://ygzf7uqcusp4ayjs.onion/tor-health/tor-health/index.html After a bit of investiguation turns out 3 new relays were advertising a HUGE bandwidth. I contacted the person (it's a known Tor researcher at NRL) and he realized they were mis-configured advertising way too much bw. It should be fixed soon hopefully but they are 3 real exit nodes. However, the humongeous weights are concerning since they were very "young" relays in the lifetime of a relay so it worth investiguating and thinking if this is normal or maybe a bug? Cheers! David > > > btw: thanks for setting an apparently proper myfamily config. > -- > tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe or change other settings go to > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk