[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Tor speed

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Tor speed
From: Eugen Leitl <eugen@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:35:16 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 02:35:24 -0500
In-reply-to: <bd9056300902121658p444e7fdbue96772cdc1702903@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <bd9056300902121658p444e7fdbue96772cdc1702903@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)

On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 01:58:27AM +0100, slush wrote:

>    Finally, average speed was around 57 kbit (JAP) and 70 kbit (Tor), but
>    JAP looked much better for use. And I would like to ask you, where is
>    reason for this Tor behaviour and if is there any possibility for
>    improvement.

The problem with JAP is that they are complying with the data
retention laws.

http://blog.pozimski.eu/?p=564=1

-- 
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A  7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Tor speed
  - From: Karsten N.
- Re: Tor speed
  - From: slush

References:
- Tor speed
  - From: slush

Prev by Author: Re: Time Warner bad / VPS recommendations
Next by Author: Re: Bittorrent
Previous by thread: Re: Tor speed
Next by thread: Re: Tor speed
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread