[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-talk] Large spike in .onion addresses - port scan?

To: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Large spike in .onion addresses - port scan?
From: Green Dream <greendream848@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 18:38:44 -0800
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 21:38:56 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=ZPgSWhasFE725OPuC09qGudRgle/1nFuQKYIzJh+zpY=; b=ICPI3EaI7DC0tBwPZ/OZHd3ZzRtOS0VTmRiKtAV207emjtP3v0WgTkjoWkA4cD6Cxv 3ut76+Q6/5PR65fAlm5OSjUbA06v6+GMXDbLqKXT7lOcOdoBUO9ozXfxZqbj0b8sn/df k9/lQQiGNgvLFNeQ3Q7OHihV6Ouz1e0A3d9F/DQ8EqJnJhRS7UOu5aJhp6qyCOTgeH8Y nt+r5LJ61vHbQV8YgNbF/VL7sUHPQ3Wv9PM1SfpfO1KKu11ox4F699nYyyrYqzCUxZx9 wQJY2FYpowp6Q/C9mLVT6viupzUSN/I/uNntNA1Pt37652OT6JWhPvV2P6x5FPK7gbLn LZeQ==
In-reply-to: <56C987E4.2020500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "all discussion about theory, design, and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <mailman.239.1455936375.3047.tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160219214406.0000130f@xxxxxxxxxxx> <56C800F2.9020108@xxxxxxxxx> <0968d98d629bf8ad78497f5719e51c3b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160221003840.GC10235@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CADL2u4joDoQebmy5hZVt2b7N=3YT8Jpv8cJ8pcRM6sKWqopzEQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <56C987E4.2020500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

>
> > Another service is http://tor.luakt.net , which managed to find my
> > otherwise unpublished (dummy) onion site after 1 to 2 weeks. It does
> listen
> > on port 80 though.
>
> LuaKT very likely runs a modified version of tor with additional logging
> [1]. Until recently, the code was hosted on github.



Interesting. Any idea what they're able to enumerate with the modified
version of Tor? Can the Tor network be hardened from this client-side
"attack"?
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-talk] Large spike in .onion addresses - port scan?
  - From: coderman

References:
- [tor-talk] Tracking blocker
  - From: Paul A. Crable
- Re: [tor-talk] Tracking blocker
  - From: Jeremy Rand
- [tor-talk] Large spike in .onion addresses - port scan?
  - From: CANNON NATHANIEL CIOTA
- Re: [tor-talk] Large spike in .onion addresses - port scan?
  - From: Roger Dingledine
- Re: [tor-talk] Large spike in .onion addresses - port scan?
  - From: RenÃ Ladan
- Re: [tor-talk] Large spike in .onion addresses - port scan?
  - From: nusenu

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-talk] Concerns about the Quora Community regarding Tor
Next by Author: Re: [tor-talk] Easier download via email?
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-talk] Large spike in .onion addresses - port scan?
Next by thread: Re: [tor-talk] Large spike in .onion addresses - port scan?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread