[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: benchmarking a node

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: benchmarking a node
From: Roger Dingledine <arma@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 04:40:27 -0500
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk@seul.org
Delivery-date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 04:40:30 -0500
In-reply-to: <20060102171301.GP2235@leitl.org>
References: <20060102123610.GK2235@leitl.org> <20060102151341.GO20671@eecs.harvard.edu> <20060102171301.GP2235@leitl.org>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i

On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 06:13:01PM +0100, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> Jan 02 18:11:26.745 [notice] Tor v0.1.0.15. This is experimental software. Do not rely on it for strong anonymity.
> Jan 02 18:11:26.746 [warn] config_assign_line(): Unknown option 'SocksListenAddress'.  Failing.
> Jan 02 18:11:26.746 [err] tor_init(): Reading config failed--see warnings above. For usage, try -h.

The new 0.1.0.16, just released, handles this.

(We'll announce it more widely in a day or so -- on the or-announce
list, which all of you should be on -- once more packages are built.)

Thanks,
--Roger

References:
- benchmarking a node
  - From: Eugen Leitl
- Re: benchmarking a node
  - From: Geoffrey Goodell
- Re: benchmarking a node
  - From: Eugen Leitl

Prev by Author: Re: Dealing with bad Tor nodes
Next by Author: Re: benchmarking a node
Previous by thread: Re: benchmarking a node
Next by thread: Re: benchmarking a node
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread