[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [OT] more from Cryptome on NSA, Windows firewals, mail services

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OT] more from Cryptome on NSA, Windows firewals, mail services
From: "F. Fox" <kitsune.or@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 16:56:51 -0800
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 19:57:04 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TGkqRHVAT0BU0ihLSKmBZItq/VfdUer10Sxdu2HetIM=; b=vchTespi/+sUUPM+NXS0UK0NzARU8QW3g7+J7PATu5MciNr7UunGB4j/CbaKnHRnbNe5sYMgwUEXTe37qvQieL4BD9G6VNnJAeSC2N8qYUptrOTMTXUfuqqXjri6e2NJYAO6russO5h6P5GHiHdls/fvJmo1DAmOp95+o1apXhc=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=KkjwZ3+53MCaKAv9d1hpNf7UjRapjn4ZLwKqW8vjmiBWOgwgIf1xAJlo9BROmmcpjzXl4yfn/dD3oBs668ZfaquBiIruatPMvzInBj7Ak6oxZLnttmylmhq9+UlzGjPesEndVsNHdSDWOSntk7gn7RXJgoL3RXK+TJeOtLRpwM0=
In-reply-to: <477C4BA8.7050602@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200712231620.lBNGKlNU012291@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3922422b0712231009h799802a8re8292644de037bda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080102204711.GB17169@xxxxxxxxxx> <20080102212434.GD5566@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3922422b0801021417s51fb4a44y59e55d823588090b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <477C4BA8.7050602@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Eugene Y. Vasserman wrote:
(snip)
> Personally (and god help me), I believe Microsoft when they say the key
> is not a key back door key. If it was, I wonder if they would name it
> "NSA". Or is that what they want us to think? :)
(snip)

If the key really had something to do with the U.S. NSA or another
equally cloak-and-dagger-type organization, believe me, they wouldn't be
dumb enough to call it "NSAKey."

They'd probably give it either a totally innocuous name, or something
that sounds warm and fuzzy...

Make it sound like they're gaining security from it. People seem to be
willing to sell their souls for "security"
*coughchoke*bull*chokechokecough*...

- --
F. Fox: A+, Network+, Security+
Owner of Tor node "kitsune"
http://fenrisfox.livejournal.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHfYRTbgkxCAzYBCMRCD4PAJ0Z37D4Igcpesuh/Iv8hiY8rfotKACfYusk
pYEUoTEpzcJJ0sckVjU5aHc=
=WBBC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- Re: [OT] more from Cryptome on NSA, Windows firewals, mail services
  - From: Eugene Y. Vasserman
- Re: [OT] more from Cryptome on NSA, Windows firewals, mail services
  - From: Nick Mathewson
- Re: [OT] more from Cryptome on NSA, Windows firewals, mail services
  - From: Ringo Kamens
- Re: [OT] more from Cryptome on NSA, Windows firewals, mail services
  - From: Eugene Y. Vasserman

Prev by Author: Re: Your computer is too slow to handle this many creation requests!
Next by Author: Re: shinjiru closed exit node acceptnolimits
Previous by thread: Re: (tor + linux).install()
Next by thread: Tor server using Vista?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread