[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: What to do at IP number change?
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: What to do at IP number change?
- From: "F. Fox" <kitsune.or@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 18:18:36 -0800
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 21:18:48 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VtM2PncNk9lfLPXAhug5aiQ96XzDZGBzaCyySDbOnBo=; b=uXBAj80QBy/WQKfZibMwlWAi4Y4d+FxM2a1BaLld1QCvuMMlrBLy4FP3b0KGZFI7dTJMHYOTfz8cM+YIvYNR4E8WEh0fWVYG8Z+GrxISDpG46lGbqJUq+8fRO2IACjY/t15Zlfplq7OFiGegt3sfuy/O9EQKvPNLvoMUjAtQAh0=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=i+//plLRBtC3pwUHONTJ6jN5ATlD7cPmEKXBzyMQbkcXniMBoIG4bUKOJeGDq0+bJM/DlSq/vkSuCL+TpJ7CLYwQdPkVi1GFFH3tPksYiiTsF3XFz0KAO2QdAr4tjeRS0i3vjXN+tFMqwTRbHgqM50kPwRl+heXldApq1bDlFv8=
- In-reply-to: <47829AE8.5090204@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <525056157@xxxxxx> <20080107211646.GE45623@tabulara> <47829AE8.5090204@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Olaf Selke wrote:
| Hans Schnehl wrote:
(snip)
| yes, they can't! At least for an exit gateway they receive
| potentially tons of abuse complaints.
Very true. This is one reason why I suggest only organizations (as
opposed to residential users) - who have the money, manpower, and other
resources to deal with legal issues - allow exits from any node they run.
As far as a middleman node, I would think that the more bandwidth it
relays, the more likely it is to be noticed; it probably wouldn't draw
too much attention on a large ISP other than its bandwidth use.
- --
F. Fox: A+, Network+, Security+
Owner of Tor node "kitsune"
http://fenrisfox.livejournal.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHgt18bgkxCAzYBCMRCCKcAJ9GfqJKaw+gs4lidyqckj+JmU5o2QCeO2w5
KJ75dVJzRof/NPg1dv3FXIk=
=RlkQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----