[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Restrict relay to internet2

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Restrict relay to internet2
From: "F. Fox" <kitsune.or@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:44:50 -0800
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 22:44:55 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=K26pHVKkpKfRbphkowYtzMb9v8UJAz7CkJusFUQTdVQ=; b=eTVWz6EaraGX/t+Ihq7RvNK9AkmpOVhivRYGUdhmubpMwBkIbxa35yorj3HbOojFDwM8A7jojQ/7NY0DqMid6YBh9l9QE0cXphQNHOK9I6SxJhBvr+oHCNR2aNXcBlvFBAWa6b+q4bjZR0mb4IoQjgLbHlx/LnJL8bJtlIzbK2c=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=cOsE410rIWl1vJBmmU6JzYUlbO8dP9wFnZLRBBEeZt/5p6zLNkC/0wgRR4VzJ0rSEkyYEXjeQYEAL/+kCNZWJPuH19bL/wh6vZ4nO803uFXvkzwsT7c3Kh4QidCoozF7eEF28jZp4TFbxniJ6saKn5q9MU00P/up8Av7GDNobko=
In-reply-to: <20080109180332.GC8710@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <525056157@xxxxxx> <20080107211646.GE45623@tabulara> <47829AE8.5090204@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4782A17A.8030200@xxxxxxx> <4782E300.5070507@xxxxxxxxx> <47850706.3020307@xxxxxxx> <3922422b0801090943q8b7cc4h7d1ccbe6246bccd7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47850996.3080307@xxxxxxx> <20080109180332.GC8710@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Peter Palfrader wrote:
(snip)
| You are right, currently Tor requires each node be able to talk to every
| other node.  For servers there is no way to say they only want to talk
| to some other servers.
|
| Also, you can't configure different bandwidth limits based on
| destination or source IP address, AS, or AS path, and I doubt that will
| be added any time soon.
(snip)

There might be a way - create a separate autonomous Tor network on I2.
However, I don't know if it'd be practical, or if it would potentially
cause problems for I1's Tor (which would suck majorly!).

- --
F. Fox: A+, Network+, Security+
Owner of Tor node "kitsune"
http://fenrisfox.livejournal.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHhZSybgkxCAzYBCMRCBcsAJ9J5GKojctQL+UcRaOfoiWRDKFguwCfTZpj
oL4BxoVNzEZyMwrbfSVypyA=
=led7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Restrict relay to internet2
  - From: Peter Palfrader

References:
- Re: What to do at IP number change?
  - From: dr . _no
- Re: What to do at IP number change?
  - From: Hans Schnehl
- Re: What to do at IP number change?
  - From: Olaf Selke
- Restrict relay to internet2
  - From: Nathaniel Fairfield
- Re: Restrict relay to internet2
  - From: F. Fox
- Re: Restrict relay to internet2
  - From: Nathaniel Fairfield
- Re: Restrict relay to internet2
  - From: Ringo Kamens
- Re: Restrict relay to internet2
  - From: Nathaniel Fairfield
- Re: Restrict relay to internet2
  - From: Peter Palfrader

Prev by Author: Re: virtues of middlemen
Next by Author: Re: Input required on Secure Wiki project
Previous by thread: Re: Restrict relay to internet2
Next by thread: Re: Restrict relay to internet2
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread