[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: One hop proxy [Re: Can nickname be duplicate?]

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: One hop proxy [Re: Can nickname be duplicate?]
From: "F. Fox" <kitsune.or@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 17:34:25 -0800
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 20:34:39 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VbQfEaQkcQiLEk5WqICYm5RN4IQ6Hucy6T1lZBBBFfM=; b=lyB0mOohMJaKKvHJ5gEsPB2k/eypeWroHctT6soWNwG1eDilq9DQnPqs9vNqJtEFU8hqCeLjmPJi5xqxBAPyH1wOpGwG9IJzFEDVHJftJx5XW+m1n/R7HgFFIku1VzDYOLgiMHDCusuWEH3qIYh5M5256I95OYZJc2mJzBeUxDk=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Q4jwbz3s4G6kSbmH+ULo+AI0DQPOnj3gyPYL7+UwCAqhQ//7hJ1rM87C7dwvb+1MtmMhyoNf7JuaTBEj3Hqi+ElD2c4CoYwB2xbGIrtlqmiTBtCaId2B3fLD+mY3TFtFx3FE5zRG4frJU/h9s8OQDDO2ewDcnvx2uosoMLJpS1w=
In-reply-to: <47A18435.90300@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <000c01c8632c$53088fc0$f919af40$@nbu.edu.cn> <20080130112913.GP21026@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <401720649.12572@xxxxxxxxxx> <401747123.11286@xxxxxxxx> <47A18435.90300@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Pei Hanru wrote:
(snip)
|> Of course what I have said above does not necessarily fit every
|> country. In
|> my country, as long as you do not spread out those banned information,
|> the
|> police would not bother you just for the reason that you browse them
|> personally.
|
| I'm also from China, haven't investigated such "browsing unsuitable
| material but not spreading" issue you described. How do you draw the
| above conclusion? Is it written somewhere?
(snip)

If true, it would seem that they're more interested in preventing news
from the inside from getting out, than information from the outside
getting in.

I would think either one would be a "threat," from a totalitarian's POV.

- --
F. Fox: A+, Network+, Security+
Owner of Tor node "kitsune"
http://fenrisfox.livejournal.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHoncgbgkxCAzYBCMRCNg1AJ994LYektTAxi7TqCYC8F4V8xm7IQCeOXug
kFyJ0ULjWzUROXDe/C5q5iw=
=rKrD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- Re: Can nickname be duplicate?
  - From: Florian Reitmeir
- 答复: Can nickname be duplicate?
  - From: Jackie
- One hop proxy [Re: Can nickname be duplicate?]
  - From: Pei Hanru

Prev by Author: Re: About WLAN and monitoring..
Next by Author: Re: About WLAN and monitoring..
Previous by thread: One hop proxy [Re: Can nickname be duplicate?]
Next by thread: Re: One hop proxy [Re: Can nickname be duplicate?]
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread