[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: tor-proxy.net

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: tor-proxy.net
From: M <moeedsalam@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 08:42:22 +0000
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 03 Jan 2010 03:42:44 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=nIEczFwwg2+716q1nkAen+sn2GMo2Skh3vDEMQjqY9o=; b=NAabecQ+FFAbBQk74kGJtgJWsAM83McK1OEhzGvjol46nuOic0cxqq7n+YY1XdmIlI oO46e5mK7XLyBgCQnVJGCegG8i1/J8yt8QpEWJGRXGbcCGjvRcDEm8kGTFmc82/8/iaL mp/FdGcd90CJL6XsDjz5tQ551lNC6Ou30Es5A=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=xH70qs3gA8vON0qrg6BrTMqJ2zDV2tQTAoMlF7zK9d7/t81uXfiGDB8WcZFcnxA153 MIPPqkboe45U7mBH1Sy389AJ+dJ+wiKMv/YPTOHs+CASm4GAa6kelPp0/c16tOZiMDBi n+fiXjWXbwi/RwqLujvB7EwCVTuFEFBsiJ6go=
In-reply-to: <306580.98213.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20100101133917.GA25966@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <306580.98213.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Also, any reason the TOR website does offer something like this?

On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 9:11 AM, bao song <michaelwprx@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

For myself, the problem with tor-proxy.net is that it is blocked by the national filter here.

So far, they haven't blocked https ports, so I can still use Tor.

Michael Wolfe

See what's on at the movies in your area. Find out now.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: tor-proxy.net
  - From: Curious Kid

References:
- Re: tor-proxy.net
  - From: andrew
- Re: tor-proxy.net
  - From: bao song

Prev by Author: Re: tor-proxy.net
Next by Author: cpu usage
Previous by thread: Re: tor-proxy.net
Next by thread: Re: tor-proxy.net
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread