Re: [tor-talk] Chaum Fathers Bastard Child To RubberHose ... PrivaTegrity cMix

[grarpamp <grarpamp@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 4:22 AM, Bryan Ford <brynosaurus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Andy Isaacson wrote:
>> The privaTegrity (PT) backdoor is significantly more malignant than the
>> Tor dirauth issue.

[Massive snip in from worthwhile tor-talk thread on central points of
authority / DHT...]

Are there networks where there is an autonomous AI engine within
the network itself, a possible distributed execution sandbox,  that
decides what, likely changing over time, set of nodes will serve elevated
roles?
And where AI's programmed evaluation metrics may somehow be tied
to some kind of consensus wherein like blockchain, major portions
of net must agree or risk fork.
And how self-adaptive and permanent is the AI?
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk