[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [OT] message formats (was: browser footprint)

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OT] message formats (was: browser footprint)
From: mplsfox02@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:47:15 +0200
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 05:47:24 -0400
In-reply-to: <200807230905.m6N95N01006773@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200807230905.m6N95N01006773@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


Scott Bennett:

 It is indeed a UNIX standard, so live with it.


And MIME is an IETF standard, so live with it. A very adopted one, btw.

People using webmailers like gmail.com don't even have a choice howtheir mail gets assembled. But you have a choice to switch your mailerto a current one. I suggest you to try out "mutt". I don't use it, asI prefer graphical user interfaces, but purists like you have fun withit and it is up-to-date software. (Man, incredible, I had thesediscussions already 10 years ago.)

References:
- Re: [OT] message formats (was: browser footprint)
  - From: Scott Bennett

Prev by Author: Re: Exit node connection statistics
Next by Author: Re: Researchers could face legal risks for Tor network snooping
Previous by thread: Re: [OT] message formats (was: browser footprint)
Next by thread: Re: [OT] message formats (was: browser footprint)
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread