[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't "amoral"?

To: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't "amoral"?
From: Tempest <tempest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 13:35:45 +0000
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:12:04 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=bitmessage.ch; s=mail; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; h=From:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:In-Reply-To:References; bh=2QMRBK8lDBRfP+caVAfIb1i3yH7anfpdH1VsnJf5cUs=; b=EWh5FUXuhwEwA9kYRVybUsSaZLewyRZTYCyD/7eYbnIWL/H8yYTQf2qvGrFr6eKxJ1FmVhI12oMC0QInJ5G9tlX1QfKzSW4vo5OTg31krF0R2hB+3FG+2kVrgI84g9sSokZvqqINw2+Jw/ipFt+kuM/E7F8jAeWBwJS+5FybF1Q=
In-reply-to: <C1E029FC-C309-401F-BC28-836E5AB17169@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "all discussion about theory, design, and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <caosgnsscyfxghjncrsgnqr6s46l=bbupqlev6mzgbhxxxzzylg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55a026c1.c6278c0a.9fd9a.fffff8e6@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55a41d93.1e13370a.115b9.ffffe0a8@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55a57f92.d038370a.2b635.78c4@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <caef4m_b7o1k3jgfaqdjusjnaollvw+fgj-om_zwc21k92vlnaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55a5069d.6010700@xxxxxxxxxx> <caagxajfi26kciejyupejy8-dufxwpet9pz5bb6cyoji9bkepuw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C7BD0DB56B0.00000705beatthebastards@xxxxxxxxx> <C1E029FC-C309-401F-BC28-836E5AB17169@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

oshwm:
> doesn't someone have to mention hitler soon or is it too early for that? :D
> 

haha! i think this sums it up almost as well.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JG5zytkypOE ;-)

-- 
gpg key - 0x2A49578A7291BB34
fingerprint - 63C4 E106 AC6A 5F2F DDB2 3840 2A49 578A 7291 BB34

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't "amoral"?
  - From: aka

References:
- Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't "amoral"?
  - From: Juan
- Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't "amoral"?
  - From: Juan
- Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't "amoral"?
  - From: Juan
- Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't "amoral"?
  - From: I
- Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't "amoral"?
  - From: oshwm

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-talk] HORNET onion routing design
Next by Author: Re: [tor-talk] Historically speaking, what was the U.S. navy /military
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't "amoral"?
Next by thread: Re: [tor-talk] evidence that Tor isn't "amoral"?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread