Re: [tor-talk] FBI cracked Tor security

[Mirimir <mirimir@xxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 07/25/2016 07:31 PM, Tempest wrote:
> Jonathan Wilkes:
>> And here we have a respondent who does a complete 180 on the 
>> constraints. Claiming that "mum" just needs to "invest the time"
>> is to do exactly the opposite of what Haroon was implying.  Now
>> it's not the software that should change, but "mum's"
>> priorities!
> 
> it's neither. it's the reality of the current situation. operating
> an automobile is a simple example. one can drive based on what's
> there. or one can learn best practices first. saying "it should be
> easier" doesn't change the fact that i isn't, nor the fact that one
> can learn to do it well.

Continuing this example, consider how Tor Project promotes Tor
browser. Look at the front page. Imagine if Tesla were promoting
Autopilot as irresponsibly, without clear warnings about limitations.
There would be outrage, no? Why not about Tor? Why do trusting users
get blamed?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJXlxZ1AAoJEGINZVEXwuQ+AX0H/2Toia/O4ySfPLyqE3EaBha4
zPqKELlW5cWrllTZD5YifdtdPcb94ypmGcgbQ5rSnirgG5fKiXCHZrmQCFHUza6R
SMlAUx5lBgQv8OXOBO1vICwHPO64s1x0/uaM/uoItJvXe5YKe6aQGoHRs1sK9vLf
k8sU2OOParodKJR6dR1HdlhhUc74JG4qAG9Wu/CPo3939Fc8Mb1hiKlF81y2uraK
ZRiuZyRg+x4YZofWSl1GV8UVSOI++zNwYeX3t8IkMGC3hFUHk8C7u7FOragb8/ez
nqkQOoQCyeCUED6H2Zc1x2nAXWwZpW1Pn65mP7X2TFqvGGdqVz9fhGm8wlkAAuI=
=wK2R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk