On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 06:39:09AM -0400, Roger Dingledine wrote: > On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 12:35:05PM +0200, Eugen Leitl wrote: > > My hoster (Hetzner) blocks port 6667 by default, unless I ask them to open > > it. Do I have to tell Tor that it's blocked, or will Tor discover it > > automatically? > > If certain IPs and ports are blocked externally, e.g. by your firewall, > you should update your exit policy to reflect this. (Good point, I'm > going to add this note into the torrc.sample.) > > There is no way (I think?) for Tor to discover it, since it can't tell the > difference between failure to connect and a problem with the site itself. Thanks. Do you see any problems with below ExitPolicy? ExitPolicy reject 0.0.0.0/8,reject 169.254.0.0/16,reject 127.0.0.0/8, reject 192.168.0.0/16,reject 10.0.0.0/8,reject 172.16.0.0/12 ExitPolicy accept *:20-22,accept *:53,accept *:79-81,accept *:110,accept *:143,accept *:389,accept *:443,accept *:636,accept *:706,accept *:873,accept *:993,accept *:995 ExitPolicy reject *:1214,reject *:4661-4666,reject *:6346-6347,reject *:6419,reject *:6667,reject *:6881-6889 ExitPolicy accept *:1024-65535,reject *:* BandwidthRate 150 KB I'm trying to titrate the BandwidthRate so I average at about 10 GBytes/day. Is there a more elegant way to allocate a monthly/daily slice of traffic, and let tor handle it? -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.leitl.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature