[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-talk] Tor (and other nets) probably screwed by Traffic Analysis by now



Or the peers could randomely drop some packets, did not think strongly
about it for now, but why not


Le 03/06/2016 à 11:57, Aymeric Vitte a écrit :
>
>
>
> Le 03/06/2016 à 07:43, grarpamp a écrit :
>> On 6/2/16, Aymeric Vitte <vitteaymeric@xxxxxxxxx> top posted without trimming:
>>> Yes: https://github.com/Ayms/node-Tor#convergence
>>>
>>> Let's imagine that one Tor circuit reaches a P2P network (here browsers)
>>> and is splitted between different peers (UDP) circuits before
>>> reasynching to a relay or end point, then the reconciliation from the
>>> source to the end point is quite unlikely
>>>> Is there any group / list that is actively researching
>>>> or developing such networks? Or that wants to?
>> If I remember right you're doing file caching / serving
>> in the browsers-as-torrent-nodes layer. Yes that
>> asynchronous would seem to break end to end timing.
> Yes and different upload bandwidth of the peers make the timing
> correlation even more difficult
>> But the 654321012 byte file "into one tor circuit" from
>> user at one end would still count same bytes out to
>> a "reasynching end point" user at the other end.
>> (Or users plural if requested by more than one user).
>> Between otherwise relatively quiet endpoints / users.
>> If they are all shuffling around encrypted bits fulltime,
>> without being driven to do so by end user demand,
>> such that the start and stop of the bytes of the poster
>> and requestor[s] can't be delineated, that looks more
>> generally like the fill traffic.
> Here we could have some packets that are lost by the peers, because of
> UDP, because a peer left and broke a P2P Tor circuit, etc, then the
> packets must be resent and x bytes sent is then not equal to y bytes
> received, more generally it could be possible to send consciously
> several time the same packets who will be dropped by the reasynching
> end point, still x bytes sent will be equal to x bytes received at the
> end point but not further, that's one of the topics of the project, to
> be studied...
> -- 
> Get the torrent dynamic blocklist: http://peersm.com/getblocklist
> Check the 10 M passwords list: http://peersm.com/findmyass
> Anti-spies and private torrents, dynamic blocklist: http://torrent-live.org
> Peersm : http://www.peersm.com
> torrent-live: https://github.com/Ayms/torrent-live
> node-Tor : https://www.github.com/Ayms/node-Tor
> GitHub : https://www.github.com/Ayms

-- 
Get the torrent dynamic blocklist: http://peersm.com/getblocklist
Check the 10 M passwords list: http://peersm.com/findmyass
Anti-spies and private torrents, dynamic blocklist: http://torrent-live.org
Peersm : http://www.peersm.com
torrent-live: https://github.com/Ayms/torrent-live
node-Tor : https://www.github.com/Ayms/node-Tor
GitHub : https://www.github.com/Ayms

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk