Re: [tor-talk] Operation Onymous Technical Explanation?

[CANNON NATHANIEL CIOTA <cannon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 2016-03-28 16:13, Flipchan wrote:
" What i have heard was that it was alot of bad opsec and also some 
pma-exploits"

Or maybe the 'bad opsec' claim is actually a case of parallel 
reconstruction in which the excuse of bad opsec is to cover the actual 
technique.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=ep7a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
Cannon N. Ciota
Digital Identity (namecoin): id/cannon
Website: www.cannon-ciota.info
Email: cannon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
PGP Fingerprint: E7FB 0605 1BD4 8B88 B7BC 91A4 7DF7 76C7 25A6 AEE2
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk