Re: Tor Exit Node Sponsorship - looking for partners

[Timo Schoeler <timo.schoeler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

thus Al MailingList spake:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I don't want to be a party-pooper, but installing just another big node
>> (like blutmagie) would still mean
>>
>> * relatively (still very low) redundancy
>>
>> * strong agglomeration of traffic on only a few nodes
>>
>> (thus leading to)
>>
>> * relatively simple eavesdropping of exit traffic
>>
>> When speaking in terms of bandwidth, e.g. 150Mbps, then I'd rather
>> spread it across n machines with 150Mbps/n each.
>>
>> Just a thought.
>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> David
>> Timo
>> ***********************************************************************
>> To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with
>> unsubscribe or-talk    in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
>>
> 
> Any new nodes are great, 

+1

> but it does seem like the best option might
> be to get people to donate to a pool of money, from which a number of
> smaller servers are paid for. 

+1

> Ideally also, there would be a pool of
> admins, so a different person could run each node (or at least a few
> nodes of the larger pool)?

I'd like to mention that it'd be an ideal solution, especially to
'create trust', to have an XOR-like admin network. So, admin A is
responsible for node A, admin B -> node B, etc, while nobody knows
another nodes credentials. However, they of course may belong to the
same family.

> Al

Timo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with CentOS - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iD8DBQFL6aeGO/2mgkVVV7kRAn3qAKCs2dSpWTnSE59OSGBMgZpm3JRI1QCfWQy3
oOxyUZccTB7nQI/uxCfp17M=
=4GeY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with
unsubscribe or-talk    in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/