Re: Answer by perfect-privacy.com Re: perfect-privacy.com, Family specifications, etc.

[Robert Marquardt <email@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>     In the meantime, perfect-privacy.com should advise this list as soon as
> its torrc files are in compliance, while the rest of us should feel free to
> use the NodeFamily information I posted earlier with, apparently, the addition
> of 17 more node fingerprints that I missed when I grepped the directory for
> the email address from the contact info.

The entries should be fine now.

Robert

On May 18, 2010, at 6:22 AM, Scott Bennett wrote:

>     On Mon, 17 May 2010 21:44:21 +0200 Moritz Bartl <tor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>> What I did was just file a report at the company's website. It took them
>> only minutes to get back to me.
>> Scott, I don't know why, but you probably didn't get their response in
>> the first place.
> 
>     No, I certainly didn't.  Also, they should have received a bounce message.
> "Bruce" neglected to mention whether he had gotten one.
>     I've long thought that every node Family should have a Family name, but
> his suggestion for the actual form of the MyFamily statement is better than
> what I had been thinking of.  I heartily recommend that it be adopted and
> implemented ASAP.
>     In the meantime, perfect-privacy.com should advise this list as soon as
> its torrc files are in compliance, while the rest of us should feel free to
> use the NodeFamily information I posted earlier with, apparently, the addition
> of 17 more node fingerprints that I missed when I grepped the directory for
> the email address from the contact info.
> 
> 
>                                  Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
> **********************************************************************
> * Internet:       bennett at cs.niu.edu                              *
> *--------------------------------------------------------------------*
> * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good  *
> * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments *
> * -- a standing army."                                               *
> *    -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790         *
> **********************************************************************
> ***********************************************************************
> To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> unsubscribe or-talk    in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/

***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with
unsubscribe or-talk    in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/