[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: Family specifications (was: Re: perfect-privacy.com, Family specifications, etc)
Hey Andrew,
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 13:44, <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 01:31:47PM +0200, tor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote 0.9K bytes in 19 lines about:
> : >From what I understand, yes, at the moment both "partners" have to list
> : each other. That's what the fuss is all about, because this becomes hard
> : to manage when you run a lot of nodes.
>
> Yes, this is how MyFamily works. Each node in the family must be
> configured to list all other nodes in the family. If I start up node
> Alice, and list Bob and Mallory in MyFamily, Bob must list Alice and
> Mallory, and Mallory must list Alice and Bob. If Mallory lists Alice
> and Bob, but neither Alice nor Bob list Mallory, it's not a valid
> Family.
Would it be possible for my to include myself in the MyFamily line?
Would make it much simpeler to maintain, since at that point all nodes
in the family can have an identical MyFamily config statement ..
Greetings!
Nils
***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with
unsubscribe or-talk in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
- References:
- Answer by perfect-privacy.com Re: perfect-privacy.com, Family specifications, etc.
- Re: Answer by perfect-privacy.com Re: perfect-privacy.com, Family specifications, etc.
- Re: Answer by perfect-privacy.com Re: perfect-privacy.com, Family specifications, etc.
- Re: Answer by perfect-privacy.com Re: perfect-privacy.com, Family specifications, etc.
- Family specifications (was: Re: perfect-privacy.com, Family specifications, etc)
- Re: Family specifications (was: Re: perfect-privacy.com, Family specifications, etc)