[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-talk] TBB Linux 32bit | 2.2.35-12 | OpenSSL to 1.0.1c but libssl.so.1.0.0 shown? +Torbutton/Scroogle
ming@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> "Update OpenSSL to 1.0.1c"
>
> If OpenSSL was updated why does my Tor Browser Bundle (2.2.35-12) for
> Linux 32bit show: libssl.so.1.0.0 in the ~/tor-browser_en-US/Lib
> directory?
>
> md5sum:
>
> d774c0f5ea0762271a814fecdf921c97 libssl.so.1.0.0
I'm using the same:
$ ls
tor-browser-gnu-linux-i686-2.2.35-12-dev-en-US.tar.gz
$ md5sum libssl.so.1.0.0
d774c0f5ea0762271a814fecdf921c97 libssl.so.1.0.0
If I run strings on this version of libssl.so.1.0.0, then on the version
distributed with 2.2.35-11, and then diff the outputs it looks as though
it has been updated:
1350d1349
< |$0;}
1481c1480
< D$(;D$8
---
> 9D$,
1757c1756
< SSLv2 part of OpenSSL 1.0.1c 10 May 2012
---
> SSLv2 part of OpenSSL 1.0.1b 26 Apr 2012
1766c1765
< SSLv3 part of OpenSSL 1.0.1c 10 May 2012
---
> SSLv3 part of OpenSSL 1.0.1b 26 Apr 2012
1891c1890
< TLSv1 part of OpenSSL 1.0.1c 10 May 2012
---
> TLSv1 part of OpenSSL 1.0.1b 26 Apr 2012
1906c1905
< DTLSv1 part of OpenSSL 1.0.1c 10 May 2012
---
> DTLSv1 part of OpenSSL 1.0.1b 26 Apr 2012
1933c1932
< OpenSSL 1.0.1c 10 May 2012
---
> OpenSSL 1.0.1b 26 Apr 2012
So it looks like the update has occurred but the names are the same.
_______________________________________________
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk