[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-talk] DNS provider that does not hijack failures

To: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] DNS provider that does not hijack failures
From: Andreas Krey <a.krey@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 21:02:14 +0200
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 31 May 2013 15:02:28 -0400
In-reply-to: <1370014347.9367.41.camel@anglachel>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk>
List-help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "all discussion about theory, design, and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <60FA59D7-18C8-4DE3-B56B-AB1B26C6EE96@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20130530230739.GA1654@tuzo> <51A7EBA8.8020605@xxxxxxx> <20130531011114.GA3909@tuzo> <51A80FEE.7000100@xxxxxxx> <20130531100950.GA7642@tuzo> <06998B8A-421F-4582-AE25-69109231FC83@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <51A8C065.8010300@xxxxxxx> <1370014347.9367.41.camel@anglachel>
Reply-to: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: tor-talk-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i

On Fri, 31 May 2013 11:32:27 +0000, Ted Smith wrote:
...
> 30 second brainstorm of reasons why Google would run a public DNS:
> 
>       * Reduce load times/increase positive UX on Google services

Esp. by including useful additional reponses.

...
> Only highly technical users will ever change their DNS server settings,
> so Google can't expect much out of this.

And it's the only open DNS server whose IP address I can remember.

Andreas

-- 
"Totally trivial. Famous last words."
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@*.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:29:21 -0800
_______________________________________________
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-talk] DNS provider that does not hijack failures
  - From: Ted Smith

References:
- [tor-talk] DNS provider that does not hijack failures
  - From: Robin Kipp
- Re: [tor-talk] DNS provider that does not hijack failures
  - From: Sean Alexandre
- Re: [tor-talk] DNS provider that does not hijack failures
  - From: Joe Btfsplk
- Re: [tor-talk] DNS provider that does not hijack failures
  - From: Sean Alexandre
- Re: [tor-talk] DNS provider that does not hijack failures
  - From: Joe Btfsplk
- Re: [tor-talk] DNS provider that does not hijack failures
  - From: Sean Alexandre
- Re: [tor-talk] DNS provider that does not hijack failures
  - From: Robin Kipp
- Re: [tor-talk] DNS provider that does not hijack failures
  - From: Joe Btfsplk
- Re: [tor-talk] DNS provider that does not hijack failures
  - From: Ted Smith

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-talk] What is the meaning of the following in tcpdump files?
Next by Author: Re: [tor-talk] HTML5 video and Tor anonymity.
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-talk] DNS provider that does not hijack failures
Next by thread: Re: [tor-talk] DNS provider that does not hijack failures
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread