Re: [tor-talk] OT: Bitmessage

[Zenaan Harkness <zen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 2/7/16, grarpamp <grarpamp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 6:14 AM, Tom A. <thomasasta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Yes take care and look yourself or believe so called experts or
>> multiplicators.
>
> Fine example of the classic passive shilling for GoldBug / BitMail, etc.
>
>> I agree that all closed source crypto is obsolete.
>
> Yeah, so is all the non-reproducible binaries of opensource code
> above, deleting critiques off your own forums, etc... ahem.

There's a theory that the stupider someone is, the less it costs to
buy their corruption.


>>> Also, since Tom spammed a link to BitMail, it's worth noting that
>>> BitMail appears to be developed by the same people who made GoldBug.
>>> For those of you keeping score at home, GoldBug falsely claimed to be
>>> a project of EFF and CCC.  It would be wise to assume that BitMail is
>>> malware or backdoored unless proven otherwise.
>
> Tom's long been associated with their little game.
> Search the whole scam out on tor-talk, cpunks, google, etc.
>
> Till y'all step up to the plate... hasta Asta.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk