[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Our directory information is no longer up-to-date enough to build circuits." problem logged
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: "Our directory information is no longer up-to-date enough to build circuits." problem logged
- From: "vikingserver@xxxxxxxxx" <vikingserver@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 15:50:01 +0100
- Cc: Roger Dingledine <arma@xxxxxxx>
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 09:50:19 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=no2pn72ujuQjOfyxIEZWOVLHbyiZ4wCV4maOVObynxI=; b=TxEUuRGBucYQALMEb9yFyx3NxQTFtErS9hWLg8KaZe0aAkijG02XaSRE6+TLpA6ruehgkCXYfRFkn9No0ih9zmVvXzwvQTbYZIcvfzpC8ThCygfGxu7JWe/zSfq0l3LmPTUGYS5xyvADnnfkAPcllCzA+Nki2OY7vbOq57GIcLw=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=FL5DWgiKChKE6fLY8gRwBZJ0Wb4FMUS//HqCwfCnMZQvh+YKRRAhQxe8Dur4jIOPFI4WpfQa43COVnlCFRAo6HS4c1HhyP3cNcncoIoxy786sCMpJowV6c+aRcNlexoSJKnXzxpHrI0PHNsikHAedzNAZ1YRp1aMcMWoOwTysMY=
- In-reply-to: <4731B18B.7010203@xxxxxxxxx>
- References: <200711051303.lA5D3E1I010249@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4731B18B.7010203@xxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
BTW, the problem is happening right now, if you want to test something
on my server.
The logging is at info level.
I can resist from restarting Tor, so that you can test the problem "live".
Tell me what to do if you need information.
/Vikingserver
vikingserver@xxxxxxxxx skrev:
> I also have reproduced this error with 0209alpha on win32 and have
> logged everything at info level.
>
> Do you want my log? How big files can you receive? The log is 30MB+ and
> I would rather send you the interesting parts rather than the whole log
> file. But how big files can you receive by email?
>
> /Viking
>
> Scott Bennett skrev:
>> On Mon, 5 Nov 2007 07:32:11 -0500 Roger Dingledine <arma@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 12:57:33AM -0600, Scott Bennett wrote:
>>>> This problem has now recurred twice for me with 0.2.0.9-alpha. The first
>>>> time I had forgotten to set the log level to "info", so I didn't get the
>>>> information that Nick wanted. This time, though, I got it. If Nick or Roger
>>>> will let me know a) how much of the log before the first problem message
>>>> appeared they would like to see and how much after and b) where to send it, I
>>>> can send that much of the log as a gzip-ped attachment.
>>> Hi Scott,
>>>
>>> I encountered this issue once with 0.2.0.9-alpha, and it wasn't
>>> immediately apparent what the problem was. Since then we've fixed a
>>> variety of things, including providing more details in the logs about
>>> *why* we don't feel we've got enough dir info.
>> Oh, good. Glad to know that.
>>> So if you could upgrade to svn trunk and see if it recurs there, that
>>> would be great. (And if it does recur, hopefully it will provide a better
>>> hint. :) (If upgrading to svn is too much of a hassle, I'm hoping to
>>> get the 0.2.0.10-alpha snapshot out sometime this week.)
>>>
>> I don't have subversion installed and have never used it, so I think
>> I'll wait for the next snapshot. Will "info" still be the log level needed
>> to get the information you and Nick want? It's awfully verbose, so if the
>> new logging stuff you've added is tied to the message about an out-of-date
>> directory, could it maybe be issued at the "notice" level?
>>
>>
>> Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
>> **********************************************************************
>> * Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu *
>> *--------------------------------------------------------------------*
>> * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good *
>> * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments *
>> * -- a standing army." *
>> * -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 *
>> **********************************************************************
>>
>