[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: AN idea of non-public exit-nodes
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: AN idea of non-public exit-nodes
- From: Ted Smith <teddks@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:05:43 -0500
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:05:49 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:in-reply-to :references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=QQVU9vzfAKPyxYfOeXYTYuxxFINQn3IgkLYbUTj8/hA=; b=e/o2oLZRMFONYI+CyYhXYx6+2/NvazBtxkCEjyCFfV1mQ+JaIKh6Sub4io/Pq0ntTG j9IPpXLJxvOj62h137AwTyh7swD1ytqWIxaIL4y4skCD8F6NkgPKzZHb1idNU2ywg1Y1 Q0LLMfZuciqWOWfAK3V40cpG1OnIfxbXILJo4=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer; b=m1Zp63iGEDvqDCKEk5bUXC80+9zhxhAeAGU9i7n5jGVD1AUH2SkrS/7C+CT/TZ0g26 uTWKP/SC0x5zrZ3iQDVwJcXhWZsSPnY8cmGIY/upkBn4Hz2IvLPi7f7TACchsgUuhCNS sEqrOBhGWBkXTl0XRqWfNCU1lIJ6fbZU9EnIA=
- In-reply-to: <20091125004907.GI18712@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <4B0C719D.1040306@xxxxxxxxx> <20091125004907.GI18712@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 19:49 -0500, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> See especially point #1: "even if we didn't tell clients about the
> list of
> relays directly, somebody could still make a lot of connections
> through
> Tor to a test site and build a list of the addresses they see."
>
> I guess we could perhaps add support for configuring your own secret
> exit node that your buddy runs for you. But at that point the
> anonymity
> that Tor can provide in that situation gets pretty fuzzy.
It's like a bridge, but for exits. They would probably have to be a lot
less friend-to-friend than bridges, but it might still be doable. I
think this is what the original poster meant, anyways.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part