Re: [tor-talk] Cloak Tor Router

[CJ <tor@xxxxxxxx>]

On 11/03/2014 03:44 AM, Lars Boegild Thomsen wrote:
> On Saturday 01 November 2014 12:42:41 coderman wrote:
>> - support robust stream isolation, beyond what may be default. perhaps
>> IsolateDestAddr and IsolateByClientAddr on TransPort (this does not
>> yet exist, but you could code it to the benefit of all Transparent
>> proxy consumer
> 
> Doesn't this already exist?  According to the Tor manual:
> 
> IsolateClientAddr
> Donât share circuits with streams from a different client address. (On by default and strongly recommended; you can disable it with NoIsolateClientAddr.)
> 
> IsolateClientProtocol
> Donât share circuits with streams using a different protocol. (SOCKS 4, SOCKS 5, TransPort connections, NATDPort connections, and DNSPort requests are all considered to be different protocols.)
> 
> IsolateDestPort
> Donât share circuits with streams targetting a different destination port.
> 
> IsolateDestAddr
> Donât share circuits with streams targetting a different destination address.
> 
> Ah - I just tested it - those two options are not recognized at all.
> 

Yes they are. But they are options to the SOCKSPort option. I hit the
same wall latelyâ
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk