On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 01:33:33AM +0200, Christian Beil wrote: > We want to protect against an external adversary and against the > provider snooping. > And we don't want the destination host to get more information than the > user wants to provide, of course. > We are still considering where to locate the gateway, more precisely the > we leave it open where the gateway is running. Perhaps it is no good > idea to let the anonymity gateway run on the broadcast gateway of the ISP. If this is G3/UMTS, lack of flat rate (my plan includes just 10 MByte/month, with 100 kByte accounting atoms, while an SSH (PuTTY) session to a mere prompt then ^D eats up ~12 kBytes) kinda renders mobile Tor moot. What I could see Tor on as a package for OpenWRT or Sveasoft, maybe even in a mesh configuration. -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a> ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.leitl.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature