[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: (unknown)

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: (unknown)
From: Claude LaFrenière <climenole@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 15:11:08 -0400
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk@seul.org
Delivery-date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 15:11:57 -0400
References: <450AEF6C.7060107@gabrix.ath.cx> <9sq23e7zy78g.i02frddcgc4z$.dlg@40tude.net> <450AF5B0.3020101@gabrix.ath.cx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1fr

Hi  *gabrix*   :


> I don't exactly remember how much bandwith my connection is supposed to
> have , anyway i have a debian sarge and apart from bwm what other
> package measure bandwith?Should i better measure without active
> established connections ? Thanks !

Experiment! 

Try with 5 Kbytes/sec then 10, 20 and so on...

(For a server the minimum is 20 Kbytes /sec.)
You don't have to give all your bandwith to Tor ...

I have an ADSL connection and run a server at 70/75 Kbytes/sec.

Why you don't make a phone call to somebody at your ISP 
to know the bandwith and speed for your connection ?

:)
-- 
Claude LaFrenière

Follow-Ups:
- Re: (unknown)
  - From: Vito Catozzo

References:
- [no subject]
  - From: gabrix
- Re: (unknown)
  - From: Claude LaFrenière
- Re: (unknown)
  - From: gabrix

Prev by Author: Re: (unknown)
Next by Author: Re: Using Gmail (with Tor) is a bad idea
Previous by thread: Re: (unknown)
Next by thread: Re: (unknown)
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread