[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Ports 465/587 in exit policy (was Re: Update to default exit policy)

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Ports 465/587 in exit policy (was Re: Update to default exit policy)
From: "F. Fox" <kitsune.or@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 18:27:08 -0700
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 21:27:52 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=x3tPDCoScd4QX2McFBswZPF0UtUF+h7hlFUq2y2dUjE=; b=uErpPmqI0kYtAOgEGHsvAloKipcEsH7ys7o6/sSx0csRCrgxn5t7qgKmXaEFCgRTnm lwQ7REUlk7f1oeIVyOxGy7tutey9IGKGLsvapZaLm/NNAC49KchPNbQg/UQronrz4CBb 1RHxNQ6OHxmVbbHAeW7Fb80uJ48twMhwxn4Ck=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=xr5xbD/LwKwI2T0k7ZAUZ01MhFB5qKRgnM0vlK2koxlA+YmPXKhP0UDccnEAXOClKh 8f3GGc57/olePQMTsTIjGY8iuzKdIQgVIwgaso37MhSnyv78Mw5YjEeAIr6TeHwUVlpn HG1hisvMuqTkYMS7cYFsz/hFzgRl0aXQmWjw4=
In-reply-to: <20080907205947.GK19491@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <48A6DD45.1040509@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48AE8AA4.7000207@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48BAB98D.40309@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080904043647.GU15456@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48BFFDE0.1020808@xxxxxxxxx> <20080904201417.GA28219@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080907205947.GK19491@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Bill Weiss wrote:
(snip)
> My Tor node runs a medium-load mail server as well, and I've never been
> blacklisted for spam stuff [1].  That seems like a decent indication of it
> not causing problems given how rabid the anti-spam people can get.
> 
> 1: I've gotten blacklisted twice by SORBS for "virus" activities, which
> were people using IRC (for bad things, I assume) via my node.  That
> doesn't count.
> 

I've gotten on some DNSBL list, which basically keeps me off of several
IRC networks. The catch is: I'm running a middleman-only node!

I really hate how some of those blocklist maintainers indiscriminately
add the entire contents of the Tor directory to their proxy lists. It'd
be really nice if they used the exit-only list that is put out
specifically for that purpose...

- --
F. Fox
Owner of Tor node "kitsune"
http://fenrisfox.livejournal.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
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=2gQC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ports 465/587 in exit policy (was Re: Update to default exit policy)
  - From: Bill Weiss
- Re: Ports 465/587 in exit policy (was Re: Update to default exit policy)
  - From: John Brooks

References:
- Ports 465/587 in exit policy (was Re: Update to default exit policy)
  - From: Roger Dingledine
- Re: Ports 465/587 in exit policy (was Re: Update to default exit policy)
  - From: F. Fox
- Re: Ports 465/587 in exit policy (was Re: Update to default exit policy)
  - From: phobos
- Re: Ports 465/587 in exit policy (was Re: Update to default exit policy)
  - From: Bill Weiss

Prev by Author: Re: why is tor traffic volume down the last few days?
Next by Author: Re: Embedded IM using Tor
Previous by thread: Re: Ports 465/587 in exit policy (was Re: Update to default exit policy)
Next by thread: Re: Ports 465/587 in exit policy (was Re: Update to default exit policy)
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread