[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: The Register article about making online anonymity illegal in Australia
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: The Register article about making online anonymity illegal in Australia
- From: Martin Fick <mogulguy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:52:36 -0700 (PDT)
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:52:40 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1252525956; bh=TsXcMbKwDjP/rA6dcVLBn4qnSTgqY2tTk0DuVuLwXYs=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=bc6eIrzLN6/UP+zhcYaeOsKHoFFNZrCIw8zJ6qugizCrx/8U6lATrS63xfkdVwLfZKIME8qH3xXXU9RE+gqESl4PCL1YvvDmRSKMvfnc7RrpC4907YVUv05ny/sEv1NNK7Ojc07DhXOdzuMu7fI4lgmPgz4So0wWmn0Ih1VhEL0=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=FeTcPyEAOiZ6mrkYB8MIoRxWONc0tMkv+uiHYJ8UMH8IQ3/KUv1l4mI6i/ZOiJmE01H6zvuiKSX6VZVZ5c2BB8R0n1BAd9OmVSeMU6hPwb3tsxK8sx28jjy0q5qqNipok3a/qDOOfM99kdcGPJa3maai4nsdjNBtYC7HtzQISjo=;
- In-reply-to: <d2e731a10909091223l3d93e3b1j3e982d230f2f4bcc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--- On Wed, 9/9/09, grarpamp <grarpamp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I figure it's an arms race between those seeking control
> and those
> valuing freedom. The sooner strong dark [or maybe even
> bright] nets
> can reach 'impossible to take down' status... whether by
> outright
> technical strength, or by stalemate with free speech
> laws... the
> better. Otherwise the race will be won by anti-anon-systems
> laws.
> The winner will likely become evident within say five
> years?
Hmm, just like the winner in all the free speech and right to bear arms cases has been determined? ;)
-Martin