[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-talk] Tor exit node
Hi!
https://www.sky-ip.org/tutorials.html
contains good covered tutorials ;)
Cheers!
spriver
Danny Despair:
> I'd like to ask you guys how I can set up a Tor exit node. I figure I want to help make a difference in the best way I can for internet freedom, but the guide on the Tor wiki isn't very helpful. If you can provide links or detailed explanation (just 're:' me). Funnily enough I know how to set up a Tor server, but not a Tor exit node.
> Thanks for the assistance to anyone who helps me. I figure people in here might be more useful than 50 article writers on websites trying to over complicate the process to earn their paycheck.
>
>
>> Thursday, September 17, 2015 10:09 AM UTC from tor-talk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>>
>> Send tor-talk mailing list submissions to
>> tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> tor-talk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> tor-talk-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of tor-talk digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. Re: victory at kilton library (Alison Macrina)
>> 2. Re: victory at kilton library (Roger Dingledine)
>> 3. Re: tor + twitter issues (isis)
>> 4. Re: Tor Browser does not recommend the default window size
>> anymore? (Joe Btfsplk)
>> 5. Re: Tor Browser does not recommend the default window size
>> anymore? (Dave Warren)
>> 6. WAF on TOR exit node (Andrej Manduch)
>> 7. Re: WAF on TOR exit node (Gareth Llewellyn)
>> 8. Torrents real-time and dynamic blocklist (Aymeric Vitte)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 12:19:34 +0000
>> From: Alison Macrina < macrina@xxxxxxxxxx >
>> To: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] victory at kilton library
>> Message-ID: < 55F95E56.7050409@xxxxxxxxxx >
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
>>
>>
>>> i just want to share the news that all of the hard work that has gone
>>> into the library freedom project paid off today at kilton library.
>>> despite pressure from the us federal government, which pulled out every
>>> card to sell fear that they had in their hat, the local community
>>> refused to accept it and thought on a global level to support the
>>> library's choice to offer a tor relay to the public.
>>>
>>> this is truly a monumental moment. libraries in the usa have often been
>>> the target of hostile actions that threaten the first amendment of the
>>> us constitution and the privacy rights of people. through a long string
>>> of legal battles, libraries have earned an extraordinary position that
>>> provides them with the ability to offer services that could land other
>>> people in significant legal battles which become both legally and
>>> politically difficult to close down.
>>>
>>> i'd just like to say thank you to everyone involved in the library
>>> freedom project who came up with the idea and didn't run away from the
>>> fight. this is an excellent beginning.
>>>
>>> if you can, please send your support to the library freedom project.
>>> https://libraryfreedomproject.org/donate
>>>
>>> this is a great victory for today.
>>
>>
>> Thank you! I think I can speak for both mrphs and myself when I say that
>> we are thrilled with the outcome. What we saw last night was an
>> incredible display of community support for free speech and Tor, and an
>> unequivocal rejection of unlawful government intrusion and FUD. The
>> Lebanon Libraries staff and community did something historic; I've been
>> an activist for a long time and I've never been a part of a direct
>> action quite like that. This is what happens when communities come
>> together to resist.
>>
>> Please keep an eye out for more news coverage. The local news in NH has
>> already put something up with a few great quotes from community members
>> present: http://www.vnews.com/home/18620952-95/library-joins-privacy-network
>>
>> If you're on twitter, say hi to @leblibraries or @nhleblibraries -- the
>> second one is library director Sean Fleming, and I know he'd be moved to
>> hear from folks in the Tor community about what his library community
>> did last night.
>>
>> Thanks all for your support. We just had the world's first Tor protest,
>> and it was a wild success. Imagine all the library exit relays we're
>> gonna get now. :)
>>
>> Alison (director of Library Freedom Project)
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 17:54:00 -0400
>> From: Roger Dingledine < arma@xxxxxxx >
>> To: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] victory at kilton library
>> Message-ID: < 20150916215400.GH53224@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:19:34PM +0000, Alison Macrina wrote:
>>> What we saw last night was an
>>> incredible display of community support for free speech and Tor, and an
>>> unequivocal rejection of unlawful government intrusion and FUD.
>>
>> Thanks for sticking with this Alison and others!
>>
>> And for those here who want to get up to speed, I think this audio
>> clip is a great summary:
>> http://www.npr.org/2015/09/16/440914105/n-h-public-library-reconsiders-support-for-anonymous-internet-network-tor
>>
>> --Roger
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 3
>> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 22:10:55 +0000
>> From: isis < isis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>> To: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] tor + twitter issues
>> Message-ID: < 20150916221055.GP5172@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>> Tempest transcribed 2.4K bytes:
>>> twitter's security configuration seems to be at war with tor. had to do
>>> multiple resets over past 24 hours, only to see a perpetual "lock" in
>>> place recently. i filed a support ticket. here's twitter's response.
>>
>> Hey All,
>>
>> I was contacted by some nice folks at Twitter who have worked to resolve this
>> issue. The problems with Tor users being locked out of their Twittter
>> accounts and asked for phone number *should* be fixed, but I wasn't given
>> many details as to what the fix entails, so?
>>
>> Is anyone still having troubles which they believe to be caused by using Tor?
>>
>> --
>> ?? isis agora lovecruft
>> _________________________________________________________
>> OpenPGP: 4096R/0A6A58A14B5946ABDE18E207A3ADB67A2CDB8B35
>> Current Keys: https://blog.patternsinthevoid.net/isis.txt
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>> Name: signature.asc
>> Type: application/pgp-signature
>> Size: 1240 bytes
>> Desc: Digital signature
>> URL: < http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/attachments/20150916/64f4826e/attachment-0001.sig >
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 4
>> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 18:24:14 -0500
>> From: Joe Btfsplk < joebtfsplk@xxxxxxx >
>> To: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Tor Browser does not recommend the default
>> window size anymore?
>> Message-ID: < 55F9FA1E.2000204@xxxxxxx >
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
>>
>> On 9/14/2015 2:56 AM, Georg Koppen wrote:
>>> Qaz:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I noticed that I don't get the `we recommend you leave your window size
>>>> with the default` prompt when I fullscreen my window. Has it been fixed
>>>> or something?
>>> The alpha version does not have it anymore and you should only see it
>>> three times if you are using a stable one.
>>>
>>> Georg
>> Why only 3 times? Is the thinking, after 3 reminders, people will
>> either heed the warning, or not?
>> What about newbies that haven't grasped the reason for not changing Tor
>> browser window size?
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 5
>> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 22:12:00 -0700
>> From: Dave Warren < davew@xxxxxxxxxxxx >
>> To: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Tor Browser does not recommend the default
>> window size anymore?
>> Message-ID: < 55FA4BA0.6030502@xxxxxxxxxxxx >
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>>
>> On 2015-09-16 16:24, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
>>> Why only 3 times? Is the thinking, after 3 reminders, people will
>>> either heed the warning, or not?
>>> What about newbies that haven't grasped the reason for not changing
>>> Tor browser window size?
>>
>> Will telling them 5 times help? If not 5, then 10? 15? More?
>>
>> You're not wrong, but at the same time, annoying experienced users who
>> understand (and don't care about) the consequences isn't necessarily
>> useful either.
>>
>> --
>> Dave Warren
>> http://www.hireahit.com/
>> http://ca.linkedin.com/in/davejwarren
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 6
>> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 05:19:27 -0400
>> From: Andrej Manduch < amanduch@xxxxxxxxx >
>> To: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [tor-talk] WAF on TOR exit node
>> Message-ID: < 55FA859F.3080206@xxxxxxxxx >
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Recently I had lot of problems with my ISP/VPS provider because my TOR
>> exit node. I was thinking about setting up some basic WAF so tor exit
>> node wont be marked by honeypots as hacker/badIP.
>> Personally I don't care about IP but I'm not the one who will be living
>> with that IP whole life. I got contract for that IP just for one year.
>> So I understand why is ISP so emotional about it.
>>
>> My question is: What tor community thinks about setting up Web
>> Application Firewall on tor exit node, and rejecting (therefore
>> tampering with) some traffic.
>>
>> The second option for me is disable whole http/https but that's
>> something I really don't want to do because I belive that most of
>> legitimate traffic is from there.
>>
>> --
>> Kind regards,
>> b.
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 7
>> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 10:34:34 +0100
>> From: Gareth Llewellyn < gareth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>> To: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] WAF on TOR exit node
>> Message-ID:
>> < CAM8M=kjtoithFFUwM3MXZO_14XOSZr6os5750UtXoe+C9aatVw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>>
>> If a nodes exit policy specifies that port 80 is allowed then port 80
>> should be allowed without hindrance.
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Andrej Manduch < amanduch@xxxxxxxxx > wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Recently I had lot of problems with my ISP/VPS provider because my TOR
>>> exit node. I was thinking about setting up some basic WAF so tor exit
>>> node wont be marked by honeypots as hacker/badIP.
>>> Personally I don't care about IP but I'm not the one who will be living
>>> with that IP whole life. I got contract for that IP just for one year.
>>> So I understand why is ISP so emotional about it.
>>>
>>> My question is: What tor community thinks about setting up Web
>>> Application Firewall on tor exit node, and rejecting (therefore
>>> tampering with) some traffic.
>>>
>>> The second option for me is disable whole http/https but that's
>>> something I really don't want to do because I belive that most of
>>> legitimate traffic is from there.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Kind regards,
>>> b.
>>> --
>>> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
>>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 8
>> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 12:09:41 +0200
>> From: Aymeric Vitte < vitteaymeric@xxxxxxxxx >
>> To: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [tor-talk] Torrents real-time and dynamic blocklist
>> Message-ID: < 55FA9165.5010909@xxxxxxxxx >
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>>
>> Is now available on http://peersm.com/getblocklist .
>>
>> This might be of some interest for some people operating some exit nodes
>> and receiving notices because some others unwisely use the Tor network
>> for torrenting, the blocklist oscillates between 10/20K IPs please see
>> at the end of the presentation below.
>>
>> There is an annual fee to access the blocklist in order to finance this
>> work, make it evolve and finance our other privacy oriented projects.
>>
>> But people can also create their own blocklist free of charge using the
>> findspiesonly option of torrent-live, as explained in "Why do we need
>> you to get the dynamic blocklist?" section of the FAQs
>> ( http://torrent-live.org/?links )
>>
>> Presentation:
>>
>> "The blocklist comes from the study we made since one year "Monitoring
>> and blocking the bittorrent monitoring spies" (abstract and summary
>> here: https://gist.github.com/Ayms/077b114a27450f773939 ), this does not
>> apply to copyright matters only but all kind of monitoring.
>>
>> Global explainations are available in the FAQs:
>> http://torrent-live.org/?links and more technical details how it works
>> here:
>> https://github.com/Ayms/torrent-live#how-is-the-dynamic-blocklist-createdmaintained
>>
>>
>> The common belief is that blocklists do not work, which is true in
>> general, this dynamic blocklist works, it has been tested since a few
>> months with some people used to get DMCA notices at least once a month,
>> so far they did not get any longer DMCA notices.
>>
>> It can not insure 100% that you will not encounter a spy but it does
>> decrease quite a lot this risk, personnally we think it's enough to make
>> sure that the spies will not detect you, but cannot prove it firmly for
>> now, only empiric use will tell it.
>>
>> The only case that the blocklist can not defeat is the one of a spy
>> behaving normally or quasi normally in a swarm, as shown in some
>> research papers, this is possible but unlikely, unless you are not a
>> "normal" person and some people are really targeting you or you are
>> seeking for very sensitive information monitored by some authorities.
>>
>> The dynamic blocklist oscillates between 10 and 20 K IPs, which is not a
>> lot, filtering the spies to reduce this number is just a matter of
>> processing capabilities, that we will increase if we get some fundings,
>> we think that the dangerous spies are no more than a few hundreds and
>> certainly less
>> than 3000."
>> --
>> Get the torrent dynamic blocklist: http://peersm.com/getblocklist
>> Check the 10 M passwords list: http://peersm.com/findmyass
>> Anti-spies and private torrents, dynamic blocklist: http://torrent-live.org
>> Peersm : http://www.peersm.com
>> torrent-live: https://github.com/Ayms/torrent-live
>> node-Tor : https://www.github.com/Ayms/node-Tor
>> GitHub : https://www.github.com/Ayms
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Subject: Digest Footer
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> tor-talk mailing list
>> tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> End of tor-talk Digest, Vol 56, Issue 20
>> ****************************************
>
>
>
>
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk