[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Field difficulty (was Re: checking in)

To: xarchon-l@xarchon.seul.org
Subject: Re: Field difficulty (was Re: checking in)
From: Mike Ciul <mike.ciul@gvox.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 16:43:08 -0400
Delivery-Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 16:44:07 -0400
In-Reply-To: <39E3721E.8E03EAA6@totalsports.net>
References: <39CAB87E.431059DF@totalsports.net> <f0432040ab6012938c671@[10.1.20.6]> <v04003a03b60534df9b88@[64.24.16.57]> <v04003a00b607a65601ad@[64.24.16.57]><f04320403b6090599bd21@[10.1.20.6]> <39E3721E.8E03EAA6@totalsports.net>
Reply-To: xarchon-l@xarchon.seul.org
Sender: owner-xarchon-l@xarchon.seul.org

>Do you think we should overhaul the AI in the next major release (2.0)?
>
>=G=

Probably. It should wait until the field code gets a fix-up, though. Maybe new field code could provide handy accessors for computer.c to use, like "what movement mode am I in?" or even "is there an unobstructed line of sight between these two points?" 

I keep hoping someone else will see to the field code changes, but no other programmers have stepped forward. I'm going to write a separate message about the field code, because I'm not sure what direction it should go right now.

- Mike
-- 
Mike Ciul
GVOX Interactive Music
1080 N. Delaware Ave. 8th Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19125
Voice: (215) 922-0880 Ext.: 144
Fax: (215) 922-7230

This message comes to you from GVOX...creating new ways to bring music to life. 
http://www.gvox.com
http://www.notationstation.net

References:
- Re: checking in
  - From: Mike Ciul <mike.ciul@gvox.com>
- Field difficulty (was Re: checking in)
  - From: Mike Ciul <mike.ciul@gvox.com>
- Re: Field difficulty (was Re: checking in)
  - From: Galen Johnson <gjohnson@totalsports.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Field difficulty (was Re: checking in)
Next by Date: field.c todo
Prev by thread: Re: Field difficulty (was Re: checking in)
Next by thread: field.c todo
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread