[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [f-cpu] vsprintf result for GCC & FCPU

To: f-cpu@seul.org
Subject: Re: [f-cpu] vsprintf result for GCC & FCPU
From: Yann Guidon <whygee@f-cpu.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 00:26:22 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: f-cpu-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: f-cpu@seul.org
Delivery-date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 18:16:26 -0500
Organization: Freedom CPU Project
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0212151436440.521-100000@devix> <03c501c2a48a$96e3aa60$0100000a@homeworld>
Reply-to: f-cpu@seul.org
Sender: owner-f-cpu@seul.org
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win95; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530

hi !

Christophe Avoinne wrote:

So it seems that option -Os has more inpact on f-cpu than intel
architecture.

And there is still some margin :-P

I did added other optimizations meanwhile so it
dropped to 5272 with -O and 4888 with -Os.

YG

*************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@seul.org with
unsubscribe f-cpu       in the body. http://f-cpu.seul.org/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [f-cpu] vsprintf result for GCC & FCPU
  - From: Michael Riepe <michael@stud.uni-hannover.de>

References:
- Re: [f-cpu] vsprintf result for GCC & FCPU
  - From: devik <devik@cdi.cz>
- Re: [f-cpu] vsprintf result for GCC & FCPU
  - From: "Christophe Avoinne" <christophe.avoinne@laposte.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [f-cpu] vsprintf result for GCC & FCPU
Next by Date: Re: [f-cpu] vsprintf result for GCC & FCPU
Previous by thread: Re: [f-cpu] vsprintf result for GCC & FCPU
Next by thread: Re: [f-cpu] vsprintf result for GCC & FCPU
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread