[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: What to do with some bugs?



> to my environment, which means writing a new HID

What environment?  Curious minds want to know...

> (The concealment condition is basically that all nil pointers have
> the same size and bit pattern, in a varargs argument list, as
> integer zero.

We already test on both 32 and 64 bit hosts; all such null pointers
should use the NULL macro.

> Any recommendations?  Is this an appropriate place to report such
> things, or should I write to someone specific, or what?

geda-dev is slightly better.

> And, if there's anyone with the time, inclination, and knowledge to
> answer some internals questions, the internal documentation I've
> found seems to be inadequate - presumably the PCB<->HID interface is
> not intended for general use and thus hasn't received the kind of
> documentation attention that the HID<->human interface has.  Not
> that there's anything wrong with that, but it _would_ save a fair
> bit of time and effort to get the design from someone who knows it
> instead of having to glark it from the code.

Mostly, that's me.  Again, geda-dev is the best place for that.


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user