Re: gEDA-user: Re: Some Linux distros to consider

[Steve Meier <smeier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Simulations and physical layouts are dangerous. If you have anything
more than schematics and you might have to demonstrate feasability and
functionality.

Steve M.



On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 14:47 -0400, al davis wrote:
> On Thursday 29 March 2007 14:45, al davis wrote:
> > n Thursday 29 March 2007 14:23, Stephen Williams wrote:
> > > Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
> > > > As from the next fedora buildsystem release (tonight):
> > > > Fedora users will be having:
> > > > geda-gattrib-20070216-1.fc6
> > > > libgeda-20070216-1.fc6
> > > > geda-gschem-20070216-1.fc6
> > > > libgeda-devel-20070216-1.fc6
> > > > libgeda-doc-20070216-1.fc6
> > > > geda-gsymcheck-20070216-1.fc6
> > > > geda-symbols-20070216-1.fc6
> > > > geda-examples-20070216-1.fc6
> > > > geda-docs-20070216-1.fc6
> > > > geda-gnetlist-20070216-1.fc6
> > > > geda-utils-20070216-1.fc6
> > >
> > > And what about verilog-*anything* and gtkwave?
> >
> >  ... gnucap and pcb?
>  and gwave?
> 
> (sorry about the multiple post.  I just want to make sure they 
> don't get left out.)
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geda-user mailing list
> geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user



_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user