[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fwd: Re: NEdit
On Thu, 20 May 1999, JF Martinez wrote:
> I ended rejecting it. It wasn't on licensing terms. Perhaps I didn't
> read it because I don't consider this being acceptable: such licenses
> means that peoiple without cheap net access can hardly get it. And
> many of them are poor people. I
actually, the license means that it can go on a cheapbytes( or similar )
CD. It precludes it from being in a SuSE/Caldera/RH box set. It's not so
much ethically bad as it is stupid: because being included in a major
distribution is a good way to get a lot of users.
Still, the technical reason is sound. Motif software is a headache for us.