Re: [tor-dev] Timers in Arti?

[Nick Mathewson <nickm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 12:58 PM Micah Elizabeth Scott
<beth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Ah. If you want to run an onion service you'll need to keep at least a
> couple circuits open continuously for the introduction points. I'm not
> sure where you would meaningfully find time to deep sleep in that
> scenario. There will be ongoing obligations from the wifi/wan and tcp
> stacks. You need a continuous TCP connection to the guard, and multiple
> circuits that are not discarded as idle. Incoming traffic on those
> circuits need to be addressed quickly or clients won't be able to connect.
>
> If we were really optimizing for a low power mobile onion service
> platform we'd have a different way to facilitate introductions without a
> continuously open set of circuits, but that would also be much more
> abuse-prone.
>
> -beth

Hm. Do you know, is it possible to make network-driven wakeup events
relatively prompt?  (Like, within a second or so if a TCP stream we're
waiting on wakes up). If so, then onion services have a decent chance
of being made to work.

As for the original question about timers, it would be good to know if
the variance between scheduled wakeup and actual wakeup can be
bounded, or if there's any way to mark a timer as  high-priority vs
low-priority or something.
_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev