[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: IOCP / C10K

To: or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: IOCP / C10K
From: coderman <coderman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 09:50:46 -0800
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-dev-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-dev@seul.org
Delivery-date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:51:02 -0500
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=VwSLTvLmd25++ZVrYa2wEVxH2n7lPBtV2f6+xZ9l6XTJVvcd2whRrWT98XEl7zvBbXnckoPbQDIIaapler8i3fBZHhXnB7TuaC/Hjw3mYhKIpMSnoxcBUnBCvUBXyhIOg1ZyODyz5LmqApqsyppl2NdcuepG3VrELVv1+BIN9AE=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=bPMTeLYA98vD14hjwqpPTmABSlDBRGIFq1kPLmoT0uispqroXLpbCq3f5rhCj6AzX5yn3dfUo6ShD1kqvi9vKsbrM435AXnUPxVKoBm8k4wYYW0kyK30u9m8Jfaw2Svkhyte9BofPOPQ3ZZw1fjK5hfabn0SVUCEzeBIxnhqxC4=
In-reply-to: <36827.82.195.181.130.1173289109.squirrel@webmail.serve.com>
References: <54198.82.195.181.130.1173263863.squirrel@webmail.serve.com> <4ef5fec60703070427w66f204a0k5e2049bf186ed3ab@mail.gmail.com> <15451.82.195.181.130.1173271485.squirrel@webmail.serve.com> <20070307172454.GF31057@totoro.wangafu.net> <36827.82.195.181.130.1173289109.squirrel@webmail.serve.com>
Reply-to: or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

On 3/7/07, Toby Douglass <toby.douglass@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

...
That means fitting IOCP into libevent.
...
This may be impossible.


it is possible, just a pain in the ass.  (hint: similar
behavioral/idiom issues affected the java non-blocking / event based
socket i/o which was delayed repeatedly out to 1.5 thanks in large
part to the same kind of momentum/architectural differences.

perhaps i can take a stab at this in the not soon future.  i had to
implement a thread pool based event dispatch for a udp stack with
similar issues.  (it won't be very friendly to integrate, mostly using
the c++ i'd written as a refresher to guide re-implementation in
libevent and adjust Tor to use updated API.

best regards,

References:
- IOCP / C10K
  - From: Toby Douglass
- Re: IOCP / C10K
  - From: coderman
- Re: IOCP / C10K
  - From: Toby Douglass
- Re: IOCP / C10K
  - From: Nick Mathewson
- Re: IOCP / C10K
  - From: Toby Douglass

Prev by Author: Re: IOCP / C10K
Next by Author: Re: Uptime Sanity Checking
Previous by thread: Re: IOCP / C10K
Next by thread: Re: IOCP / C10K
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread