[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: 103-multilevel-keys and 101-dir-voting
- To: or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: 103-multilevel-keys and 101-dir-voting
- From: Roger Dingledine <arma@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 08:42:54 -0400
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Delivered-to: email@example.com
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Delivery-date: Mon, 21 May 2007 08:43:05 -0400
- In-reply-to: <20070430171613.GH29876@totoro.wangafu.net>
- References: <20070421174858.BB3581408DB3@moria.seul.org> <20070430062239.GH28282@moria.seul.org> <20070430171613.GH29876@totoro.wangafu.net>
- Reply-to: or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 01:16:13PM -0400, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> > In general, I think we're moving in the right direction here, and it's
> > a fine time to start coding if you'd like to (which from talking to you
> > it sounds like you do). Let us know if you run into any other troubles
> > that are non-obvious.
> Okay. I don't think we have a status for this. Should we loosen the
> status of "Accepted", or add a new "Trying to code" status?
We might call it "Prototype" status, to indicate that the next step is
to start building it and find out what new issues emerge, but that some
are expected and we'll be modifying the proposal based on them.
We might also change "Accepted" in our minds to include the fact that
issues can emerge even on accepted proposals that cause us to change
our mind or need more discussion.
I'm fine with either approach. Pick your favorite and that's the one I