On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:06:40 -0400 grarpamp <grarpamp@xxxxxxxxx> allegedly wrote: > On 8/24/10, Sven Olaf Kamphuis <sven@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> additional management overhead. > > eh say what? > > I agree with this from experience as well. There is no real technical > problem with > PI space on non-legacy gear anymore. And any recent PC can crunch > more tables than routers of the same age, they just don't have > silicon switching or port density yet... that's an aside, though > relevant to following sections. > > It's age or just more hands on setup and verification/paper grunt > work that some [many] operators decline to do, especially without > surcharge. Small ISP's should take it on for fun. Large ones that > don't take it on may be a sign of technical or other weakness. I moved the /24s from UKERNA to CWC back in the early to mid 90s (and we didn't call them Clueless and Witless for nothing....) > > mick sayeth > > The text file for RFC 854 contains exactly 854 lines. > > Do you think there is any cosmic significance in this? > > yeah, it'll probably take 854 years to get rid of telnet, > and umm, rlogin... eh mick? heh. :-) Heh indeed, but ssh.net had gone when I registered that. Mick --------------------------------------------------------------------- The text file for RFC 854 contains exactly 854 lines. Do you think there is any cosmic significance in this? Douglas E Comer - Internetworking with TCP/IP Volume 1 http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc854.txt ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature