[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: FreeBSD with xinetd

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: FreeBSD with xinetd
From: Marco Gruss <kork@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 17:35:11 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk@seul.org
Delivery-date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 11:35:18 -0500
In-reply-to: <43EA1511.8080308@csuohio.edu>
References: <43EA1511.8080308@csuohio.edu>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20050923)

Hi,

Michael Holstein wrote:

Despite what everyone says about TOR being cpu/memory intense, I'm using far more memory keeping all those xinetd connections open. Does anyone know a better way to do this on FreeBSD?

rinetd (http://www.boutell.com/rinetd/) might be the thing you're
looking for. I've only used in on linux, but since it's in the
FreeBSD ports collection, I guess it works flawlessly on FreeBSD,
too.

Marco

References:
- FreeBSD with xinetd
  - From: Michael Holstein

Prev by Author: Re: Exit node blocking site?
Next by Author: Re: Torpark and security
Previous by thread: FreeBSD with xinetd
Next by thread: Re: FreeBSD with xinetd
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread