On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 17:41 +0000, John Case wrote: > On Mon, 14 Feb 2011, Ted Smith wrote: > > > Sorry, but this has been a long thread and I want to try to make > sure I > > understand something important. > > > > Is it true or false that traffic was actually exiting through > > gatereloaded et all? > > > > I recall seeing that those nodes weren't marked as exits in the > > consensus anyway. If that is the case, then all of John Case's > arguments > > related to super-secret movie-plot usages of Tor and servers running > on > > port 80 only accessible through gatereloaded et all seem to be > > irrelevant. > > > And therefore will always be irrelevant, never affecting a single ToR user > into the infinite future. Is there an or-parliament list I should be on if I want to be an Official Tor Project Legislator, making these *important policy decisions* that affect Tor into the *infinite future*? I know it's easier to send emails about something incredibly unimportant to inflate one's own ego than it is to actually get shit done, but this is ridiculous.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part