[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Heavy CPU usage.. normal?

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Heavy CPU usage.. normal?
From: SK <sk.list@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:56:35 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk@seul.org
Delivery-date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 03:57:02 -0500
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=OMg+YHJ2AAhNXXTVtwMq1t1oAOnrxYPMGhbmDoUqXFQqILPSGKwMV1sYxlUecwGdTHBiJKyDFUJobo++OHMbG8dhxnr7BqxDAmF3KDun/yop0Oress5ZJWJZb1yAfvziZOzEW9z2ywfcojADz23NARdlfhuNTMbzh37hxARfCk8=
In-reply-to: <20050105042351.T2564@moria.mit.edu>
References: <6ca73f65050105005546bd2ccf@mail.gmail.com> <20050105042351.T2564@moria.mit.edu>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

> Check out http://archives.seul.org/or/dev/Dec-2004/msg00035.html
> 
> Several people have reported being quite happy with the cpu load fixes
> that are in cvs (but not in the 0.0.9.x series yet). They seem stable
> enough that I'll probably try to get them into 0.0.9.3 (whenever it
> arrives).
> 
> If that doesn't solve it for you, get our your profiler and tell me
> which parts of our code are crummy. :)

Just to close this thread, CVS codes are indeed less hungry. Typical
%CPU usage has gone down to 4 while %MEM is at a low 2!

Thanks to all developers.

-S_

References:
- Heavy CPU usage.. normal?
  - From: SK
- Re: Heavy CPU usage.. normal?
  - From: Roger Dingledine

Prev by Author: Re: Heavy CPU usage.. normal?
Next by Author: Re: What happened?
Previous by thread: Re: Heavy CPU usage.. normal?
Next by thread: Please verify our OS X installer instructions
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread