[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Quick question on Torbutton and NoScript
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Quick question on Torbutton and NoScript
- From: Ringo <2600denver@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 03:17:22 -0500
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 03:17:50 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=eCb/6D+vRRACIViP3uPhxhEDrH07XHX3fofG2sEUr9M=; b=ZD40G4Wtl0zylmF36KOX2XPik/UXZmFPGyjw/XhHSAKrueedL9bu3bNzJ+1ae9RThj qojTrwPvzNNTnJjEA2TuFY53ExI5ZIHZSUL6Q49r642zPh4BfxUmo/ETD4lpaxIcIECV XbpBE8Ojrsw56hJZNsUD2rAHxYYNrbvWpGtxE=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=f4Xak5gxJ1kAeyWELuiKKFeI0RD7T3MK1QUiPO9k4SzBSTy/souQ/TGx3bMN+hffJB KLiqOCgBc0tNCXOpqG61tbI3dqLOxev5/RgCFtFEKDXIfQh3xhSaUfJkEP9y4U3iejqH jSKc6qQXK3H/+AgzOGwwJ5MfZhgFV3f+eEHro=
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Dear Tor universe,
A while back I remember that it was suggested that people not use
TorButton with NoScript but now it seems to be an acceptable course of
action.
I give workshops on online privacy with a significant portion of them
focusing on Tor and I got a question from somebody that I was unable to
answer which went something like this:
Does the TorButton "hook dangerous javascript" function still work if
you tell noscript to allow scripts on certain pages/sites? It's
obviously smartest to keep a no javascript policy unless absolutely
necessary, but assuming one *has* to allow it occasionally, are they
exposing themselves to that much additional risk?
Thanks for any help ya'll can offer,
Ringo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAktC9ZIACgkQETpif9i/sroPUQCeIDeILtp/4UbOkqv+8PFBEEpR
rPwAn1ZsDRV/tj96LXjNr7t4boI2xTKK
=RTZQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with
unsubscribe or-talk in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/