Michael wrote:
Kyle Williams wrote:reject 0.0.0.0/8:* <http://0.0.0.0/8:*> reject 169.254.0.0/16:* <http://169.254.0.0/16:*> reject 127.0.0.0/8:* <http://127.0.0.0/8:*> reject 192.168.0.0/16:* <http://192.168.0.0/16:*> reject 10.0.0.0/8:* <http://10.0.0.0/8:*> reject 172.16.0.0/12:* <http://172.16.0.0/12:*> reject 66.109.20.52:* accept *:80 accept *:443 accept *:43 reject *:*Kyle,One more question if you would indulge my curiosity. What service was the course of the "spam"?Michael
I'm replying to my own post because my comment makes me look like a moron.
I was wondering if the complaint was about abuse of whois servers or web based services.
Michael