[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-talk] Tor (and other nets) probably screwed by Traffic Analysis by now



On 2016-06-05 13:38, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
Prediction market (place your bids):
"First networks utilizing fill traffic as TA countermeasure to
emerge and reach early deployment by year end 2017..."
It's a bit off-topic, but it's worth keeping in mind what
the greater free software community is good at-- like
replicating data-- and what it isn't-- like hiding data.
For example-- if you've been afraid to look up something
on Wikipedia for fear of typing "those words" into Google
or Wikipedia, just download Wikipedia. They have all the
tools and docs to help you do that, with an archive format
that probably fits very comfortably in your free hard drive
space.
If anyone does this, you'll immediately notice the benefit
of the approach: that cover traffic isn't just random
data-- it's Wikipedia. You can use it for future queries
regardless of subject matter, with a greater probability of
privacy than anything a future cover-traffic network can get
you.
There are many other examples out there. If you spend
a little time each week thinking about this approach you'll
find it changes how you use the web and internet. Those
changes will affect your values, and if enough people do
this it obviously affects what we want and need out of a
future cover-traffic network.

-Jonathan

The idea of downloading the Wikipedia archives is pretty good since it doesn't note the content you were looking for. Another idea is to use search engines that protect your privacy such as ixquick or duckduckgo (they store search queries but they don't track individuals (I.e they don't store your IP Address, as far as we know that is).
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk