[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: reconsidering default exit policy

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: reconsidering default exit policy
From: Chris Palmer <chris@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:53:14 -0800
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk@seul.org
Delivery-date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:00:25 -0500
In-reply-to: <20050310225243.GA16598@eecs.harvard.edu>
References: <20050310225243.GA16598@eecs.harvard.edu>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2i

Geoffrey Goodell writes:

> What do people think?

Looks perfect to me. Answering the 127.0.0.0/8 question is a necessary
precondition to adoption. Since the answer might vary by platform, the
install scripts must take that into account.


-- 
http://www.eff.org/about/staff/#chris_palmer

Attachment: pgpe2iWYgQRio.pgp
Description: PGP signature

References:
- reconsidering default exit policy
  - From: Geoffrey Goodell

Prev by Author: Re: (FWD) privoxy.tor: Script control privoxy's tor.
Next by Author: Re: reconsidering default exit policy
Previous by thread: reconsidering default exit policy
Next by thread: Re: reconsidering default exit policy
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread