[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Answer by perfect-privacy.com Re: perfect-privacy.com, Family specifications, etc.

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Answer by perfect-privacy.com Re: perfect-privacy.com, Family specifications, etc.
From: "Sebastian Hahn" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 08:23:34 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 20 May 2010 02:23:39 -0400
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <201005200542.o4K5g8Ex027973@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <201005200542.o4K5g8Ex027973@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.15

>      All that would do would be to say to all clients, "Don't include
> this node in the same circuit as any of the blutmagie nodes."  How would
> that be an attack?

I can list all the nodes I don't control...

***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with
unsubscribe or-talk    in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/

References:
- Re: Answer by perfect-privacy.com Re: perfect-privacy.com, Family specifications, etc.
  - From: Scott Bennett

Prev by Author: Re: Reducing relays = reducing anonymity ? Tortunnel.
Next by Author: Re: HTTPS Everywhere Firefox addon
Previous by thread: Re: Answer by perfect-privacy.com Re: perfect-privacy.com, Family specifications, etc.
Next by thread: Re: Answer by perfect-privacy.com Re: perfect-privacy.com, Family specifications, etc.
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread