"Paul Ferguson" <fergdawg@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Not good. What's that? > Via TheAge.com.au. > The hack required little more than tools freely available on the > internet, and Egerstad maintains he broke no laws. I find it hard to believe that his "hack" didn't violate any laws in Sweden and I also have my doubts about the raid taking place in the way described in this poorly-researched article. Without more information I get the impression that he broke Swedish law and is now facing the consequences. Big deal. Fabian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature