Re: [tor-talk] "Hidden Services" vs "Onion services"

[Virgil Griffith <i@xxxxxxxxx>]

Onion sites sounds nice to me too.  But we might have to change the
name to from tor2web to onion2web.

-V

On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Seth David Schoen <schoen@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Nathan Freitas writes:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014, at 11:38 PM, Virgil Griffith wrote:
>> > I'll start trying "onion service" and just see if it catches on.
>>
>> Since these things are mostly used for websites, why not call them
>> "onion sites" or "onionsites"?
>>
>> Typical users don't talk about web services, they talk about web sites
>> or pages. Perhaps they say "online service" but that usually means an
>> ISP or something larger than just a site, imo.
>>
>> "Turn your website into an onionsite"
>> "Access the onionsite in the same way you access a website"
>
> It could be technically consistent to say both "hidden services" and
> "onion sites" -- you could say that onion sites are web sites that are
> served as hidden services.
>
> --
> Seth Schoen  <schoen@xxxxxxx>
> Senior Staff Technologist                       https://www.eff.org/
> Electronic Frontier Foundation                  https://www.eff.org/join
> 815 Eddy Street, San Francisco, CA  94109       +1 415 436 9333 x107
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk